Proposed amendments to "Learning Portland" Vision

Submitted by Amanda Fritz on September 18, 2007 - 11:19pm.

Earlier today, I e-mailed the Portland Public Schools (PPS) Board members, expressing concern about the language in the "Learning Portland" section of VisionPDX. It was released just yesterday, goes to Council Wednesday evening. The goals proposed for "Learning Portland" are:


1. Every Portlander has the opportunity to achieve individual educational goals, and Portland provides an educational environment that ensures that anyone has the ability to obtain higher education
degrees.
2. The public and private sectors jointly provide a K-20 educational enterprise that serves the intellectual, cultural and economic needs of the region, the city and its people.
3. Portland’s higher education institutions serve as incubators of intellectual, economic and creative ideas.
4. Our schools are multiple-use facilities and integral components of our neighborhoods and
communities.
5. The arts are integrated into all K-12 education as a commitment of Portland to develop and foster creativity and innovation.
6. Portland provides adequate training for its future economy by investing in programs that prepare young people for the workforce.
7. Teachers are valued and supported in the schools and in community.

PPS Directors Ruth Adkins and Dilafruz Williams responded to my message, and generously dedicated a significant portion of their evening to working on the problem. Together, we propose:


1. The Council should postpone acceptance of the VisionPDX document, to allow more time for community review, comment and amendment requests on it.


2. Everywhere that "K-20" education is referenced, change to "preK-20".


3. Amend Vision Goal # 2
(above) to read:


* Quality public education is readily available to every preK-20 student, and Portlanders cherish our five public school districts as the finest in the country. Excellent public schools are found in every Portland neighborhood. The public and private sectors provide integrated preK-20 educational services that richly satisfy the intellectual, cultural, environmental, and economic needs of the region, the city and its people.

If the Council agrees to postpone acceptance of the Vision to allow more review and amendments, clearly there are other parts of this section that could be improved. Portland as a place for lifelong learners, from quality child care and preschools through programs for seniors, for example. And perhaps mention of the role of schools in promoting sustainability through environmental education, and suchlike. But if the document is accepted tomorrow (today, by the time most readers see this post), I think making the amendments above would improve it significantly.

Submitted by oregonian37 on September 18, 2007 - 10:39pm.

Nice work ma'am.:)

Submitted by PeteJacobsen on September 19, 2007 - 6:08am.

I add an "amen" to requesting council to postpone acceptance. Certainly they can see that if they don't make the document accessible, citizens have little possibility of study and meaningful response. Most citizens need time to study such a document and find like minds to propose changes. Not everyone has Amanda's tenacity, not to mention rolodex!

Submitted by Thomas Ngo on September 19, 2007 - 8:02am.

You should request to speak at the City Council hearing this evening.

Submitted by Amanda Fritz on September 19, 2007 - 8:51am.

Oh, I plan to. It's a public hearing, and anyone who wishes may sign up at City Hall to take a turn at the microphones. I think it will take a lot of folks showing up, to have a chance of postponing the acceptance of the document and/or making amendments in it. So if you share my concerns, Thomas and others, please come on down to 1220 SW 4th, and add your voice or at least your presence. Come if you disagree with me, too. That's what this public hearing is supposed to be for - so that citizens can say what they think about the proposed Vision. I hope City Council will remember that for many Portlanders, this is the first time they've heard of or participated in the Vision process. There should always be the potential for individuals to make a difference at the final public hearing... otherwise there's not much point in holding it.

Submitted by Steve Buel on September 19, 2007 - 4:24pm.

Amanda, you need to amend the statement that excellent schools are found in every neighborhood to "in many Portland neighborhoods", unless of course you are satisfied with being intellectually dishonest. Because the disparity of the schools in this city, particularly in the middle grades is a travesty of major proportions.

Submitted by Steve Rawley on September 19, 2007 - 4:55pm.

Steve B., I think the vision statement is supposed to be what we envision, not what we already have.

To that end, the statement should include a stronger wording about neighborhood funding equity in our public schools.

Submitted by Amanda Fritz on September 19, 2007 - 10:06pm.

Thank you for clarifying that my proposed amendment is a goal, rather than a statement of current status, Steve R.

I think providing excellent public schools in every neighborhood will have to be done with funding equity, i.e., allocations that are just and fair - not necessarily equal. Some schools will need more money than others, to provide services more needed in economically disadvantaged areas than in affluent neighborhoods. I heard tonight that Riverdale, the school district with the richest per capita property tax base in the state, demanded and got a share of a recent City of Portland handout, because they have a few students who live within Portland. Equitable?

Only Ruth Adkins and I testified on the education policy this evening. I received a copy of two other citizens' testimony who weren't able to attend but emailed comments to the Council, and I thank those who did that. I hope everyone who posted suggestions here about what should or shouldn't be in the city's document also sent them to the City Council. And that others who had time to either comment here, or to Council, chose the latter.