The RSS advantage

In a comment thread over the weekend, Chris Smith observed that using RSS feeds can greatly enhance citizens' ability to track issues and receive the kinds of information they're interested in. I responded that others, like me, might not be familiar with what RSS is or does, and would anyone care to write a Guest Post on it? Within an hour, Chris sent me a first draft. I had to ask for additional information ... and here it is.

Guest Post by Chris Smith

Chris is a Northwest District Association neighborhood resident who is the founder of Portland Transport. He also chairs the Portland Streetcar Citizens Advisory Committee and serves on the board of Portland Streetcar, Inc.

What is RSS and why might citizens with overflowing e-mail inboxes care about it?

RSS stands for Really Simple Syndication [see the Wikipedia entry for more: RSS]. The easiest way to think about it is as a ‘headline service’. It provides you with the title and usually a summary (or sometimes the entire content) of a blog post, news article, or other piece of electronic content.

Where do you get RSS feeds? Virtually every blog has an RSS feed. RSS existed before blogs, but blogs made it popular. It’s a way to keep up with blogs without obsessively clicking refresh on the home page of a dozen different blogs. Most news organizations now have RSS feeds for their online content (this is true of the Oregonian, WWeek, Mercury and the Trib). In fact, many e-mail listservs now have an RSS feed option as an alternate way to read the list messages.

So why might someone prefer to keep track of things in RSS versus e-mail? There are several reasons:


1) There are many flavors of RSS readers, and you can pick one that fits your style of reading.
I like Bloglines (www.bloglines.com) myself, but you can follow RSS feeds on your Google or Yahoo home pages, and you can get programs for your PC or Mac that read RSS feeds. Indeed, the current versions of most web browsers (Internet Explorer, FireFox, Safari) all include RSS reading capabilities.


2) You can read RSS feeds very quickly.
Unlike e-mail where you have to click and open the message to read it, you can scroll through one page of RSS headlines that contains the equivalent of dozens of e-mail messages.


3) You don’t have to decide what to keep or delete.
When I deal with e-mail, I have to decide if I’m going to save and file the message or delete it. With RSS, once I’ve read it, it’s gone (some readers will let you check a box to make an entry hang around). But if you decide later you want to go back to something you read earlier, there is generally a way to look at the archive (Bloglines will let me see all entries for the last 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours, last week, or last month for example). So the RSS aggregator is doing your archiving for you.


4) It’s easy to group feeds by theme.
For example in Bloglines, I have one folder for transportation-related feeds, another for local political/civic feeds. When I look at each of these my mind is already in the right ‘mindset’ to process the information. You can do this in some e-mail programs, but it’s generally much more difficult to set up.


5) You can share!
Most web-based RSS readers will let you export the list of feeds that you read to share with your friends.

Fundamentally I think RSS expands your ability to track information. I’m subscribed to about 50 feeds in Bloglines. That would be equal to hundreds of additional e-mail messages every day. I simply couldn’t keep up in e-mail form.

As an example, here’s how you would subscribe to Amanda’s blog in Bloglines:


a) Go to www.bloglines.com, follow the ‘register’ link and create an account


b) After registering and signing in, go to the www.bloglines.com/myblogs page and click ‘Add’ in the ‘Feeds’ tab.


c) In the box that says ‘Blog or Feed URL:’ type in Amanda’s URL: http://www.amandafritz.com and hit the subscribe button – Bloglines will now find the RSS feed on Amanda’s site.


d) You’ll have the choice to either add Amanda’s feed at your top-level folder or to create a new folder (or put it any existing folder you may already have).


e) After that, Bloglines will update your ‘myblogs’ page whenever there is a new entry on Amanda’s site and you can rest your mouse finger!

Question, Chris: It would show when I post a whole new article, but not when there is a new comment, right? So the "recent posts" feature of my site, which I mentioned in my six+ months review yesterday, is helpful even to folks using RSS, right? Thank you for the technology lesson! ~ Amanda

I've tried to use several

I've tried to use several different RSS readers from time to time, and each time I've given up on them. I must be missing something important. First, I don't see it as RSS vs email, but RSS vs dedicated web-sites. I'm not sure what email has to do with it unless you're talking about listserves. Second, the "headline" that I see is almost always too short to get the jist of the post - often too short to know if I want to read it. Third, assuming I click on a headline for a blog entry, I'm usually taken to the item in the blog's main page. If I want to read the whole article, I have to click yet again ("read more"). I might get interested in RSS if I could configure a reader to show me the whole article, but I think the headline content is decided at the origin of the post. Fourth, RSS only notifies me of the original post, not of comments written. Fifth, Chris' item 3 is a negative as far as I'm concerned. I'll manage my own archiving, thank you! I re-read old posts often, and would end up at each web-site anyway. If there are ways around these problems, I'm quite willing to try the process again. As I said, enough people rave about RSS that I suspect I'm missing something important.

Amanda, to your question

Amanda, to your question about comments, that is indeed a trade-off. Some sites allow you to subscribe to a feed of all comments (Portland Transport has one), others let you subscribe to comments for a particular post (bikeportland.org does this if I recall). There are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. The other thing I've noticed is that some blogs will change the 'updated' date on a post after a certain number of comments have been posted, which causes it to reappear in the RSS feed, so you have an indication that there is activity. My own pattern is generally that I find only a small percentage of blog entries that I feel the need to track comments on (other than on my own blog of course, where I read all the comments). I will generally keep these open in a browser window and refresh occasionally.

To Pete's question about

To Pete's question about summaries versus full post content in the RSS feed, that a choice made by the person who configures the feed (the blog owner or their technical wizard). Again there are pros and cons. Including the full content helps those who may want to read the whole post in one place, but puts a burden on those who want to skim. Using a summary also encourages people to click through to your blogs to read the whole post, which lets you track them in your site statistics. It's hard to get statistics about how many people are reading your RSS feed because many people may see it on a site like Bloglines, even though Bloglines only requests it from my site once. A lot of it still comes down to personal preference, but speaking as one citizen, I feel like my reach is increased considerably by using RSS.

Speaking directly to Chris

Speaking directly to Chris #3 and Pete #5... it all depends on the application you're using. I read RSS feeds through my email application (Thunderbird) which creates a single email-like item for each blog post. They go into a special folder -- and I can mark stuff read/unread and even delete it from my the folder.

Agreed - part of the beauty

Agreed - part of the beauty of RSS is that you can find a reader application that fits your style. I like the "scan and let it go" approach, but others may have different styles (and read different feeds for different purposes).

How well does RSS work for

How well does RSS work for those of us who are still dependent on dial-up access to the internet? Does the slow speed of dial-up connections create problems? -- Linda